Rare Case Marks




All about the Gruen watch cases and their makers

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Mr. Bieser » Wed 21. Feb 2024, 10:08

I've not seen many cases by this firm.

117. Gunther. La Chaux-de-fonds


s-l1600 (10).png



https://www.ebay.com/itm/315170965349
Mr. Bieser
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed 3. May 2023, 09:21

by Advertising » Wed 21. Feb 2024, 10:08

Advertising
 

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Fred » Wed 21. Feb 2024, 17:03

That’s a first, to me.
User avatar
Fred
 
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri 5. May 2023, 22:00

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Dietrich » Thu 22. Feb 2024, 06:23

Yes, I have not noticed the 117 hammerhead at a Gruen. Gunther produced also for Rolex and Patek, so they apparently have a very good reputation. Tiny watch with the 6 ligne caliber 265 made by Felsa. Should be about 1962 and I'd say it may be almst worth the money with about 10g 14k gold and 2g 18k gold...
So if seller should agree to reduce the prce to $400 you can't make anything wrong buying it.
User avatar
Dietrich
Administrator
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon 1. May 2023, 11:53
Location: Osthofen, Germany

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Mr. Bieser » Wed 28. Feb 2024, 18:36

Number 2 in hammerhead is for Fritz Baumgartner, Geneva, an uncommon but known Gruen supplier...but the rare case marks that I wanted to highlight on this 1955ish example are the caliber/style numbers....on the outside. Don't see that everyday do ya!

s-l1600 (7).jpg



https://www.ebay.com/itm/186319543962
Mr. Bieser
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed 3. May 2023, 09:21

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Fred » Wed 28. Feb 2024, 22:07

That is rare! And still legible. I note Import 316 is missing from the master book
User avatar
Fred
 
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri 5. May 2023, 22:00

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Dietrich » Thu 29. Feb 2024, 12:00

It would indeed be rare if it would be the caliber / style number combination. But I have doubts that the numbers represent cal/style numbers because caliber 217 is a 7 jewel caliber. This would be a bad mismatch with an 18k gold case I think. Style number 894 is only valid with caliber 275, so I do not think that this is neither the caliber nor the style number. There will not be a caliber 275 based watch with a round crystal of that size in 1955.
User avatar
Dietrich
Administrator
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon 1. May 2023, 11:53
Location: Osthofen, Germany

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Mr. Bieser » Thu 29. Feb 2024, 12:14

Hm, ok. So rare we don't know what the numbers are! Lol
But I did share a link so u can see...
Good points. Then my estimate of date is mistaken bc I was basing it on what I thought was style number.
Mr. Bieser
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed 3. May 2023, 09:21

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Dietrich » Thu 29. Feb 2024, 12:30

I agree, quite misleading...
But date may be about correct, me be a little later, around 1960 I would think, but 1955 is still possible. But my guess would be post masterbook era. May be it is #217 out of a 894 piece batch?
User avatar
Dietrich
Administrator
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon 1. May 2023, 11:53
Location: Osthofen, Germany

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Mr. Bieser » Thu 29. Feb 2024, 14:33

A run of 894 cases? If that theory pans out, that would be valuable info, we've never had confirmation of data like that for Swiss sources.
Only thing I ever hear tossed around alot is runs of 2000 domestically by Wadsworth, which I think the info originated from either Bob Gruen or Cleves.
Mr. Bieser
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed 3. May 2023, 09:21

Re: Rare Case Marks

Postby Fred » Thu 29. Feb 2024, 14:44

There is also the Gruen Geneve nomenclature, which to me seems not fitting with the usual style numbers…
FA943FE9-2D91-4521-BD97-DB3A79D81420.jpeg
User avatar
Fred
 
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri 5. May 2023, 22:00

PreviousNext

Return to Gruen watch cases

Who is online

No registered users

cron